Idaho moves ahead with possible grizzly bear hunting season

Idaho officials have started the process of opening a grizzly bear hunting season this fall that would allow the killing of one male grizzly.

The Fish and Game Commission in a 7-0 vote March 22 directed the Department of Fish and Game to gather public comments on the possible hunt.

The department will use those comments to draft a possible grizzly bear hunting season for the commission to consider in May.

“There would be a lot of interest in the possibility of a grizzly season,” Commissioner Derick Attebury said after the meeting. Attebury represents the portion of eastern Idaho where the hunt would occur.

The process for making comments and possible public meetings haven’t been announced.

About 700 grizzlies live in Yellowstone National Park and surrounding areas in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho. Montana doesn’t plan to hunt grizzlies this year, while a proposal in Wyoming would allow the killing of up to 24.

Wildlife advocates and Native Americans have filed lawsuits to restore Endangered Species Act protections for the bears and prevent the hunts.

“It’s disappointing that another state is moving in the direction of hunting grizzly bears,” said Andrea Santarsiere, senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. The group is a plaintiff in one of several lawsuits seeking to restore protections for Yellowstone grizzlies.

The formula for the number of bears that can be hunted in each state involves a region surrounding Yellowstone National Park called the Demographic Monitoring Area. The number of bears for each state is based on how much land area is in the monitoring area. The number of bears allowed to be hunted in total is based on mortality studies of bears. The end result is that this year, officials say, Idaho can hunt one male bear and Montana six male bears. Wyoming can hunt 10 male bears and two female bears.

A much larger region includes additional bears not within the monitoring area. Wyoming’s proposal allows the killing of 12 bears in that additional area.

Toby Boudreau, Idaho Fish and Game assistant wildlife chief, said Idaho wasn’t looking at hunting in that area this year.

Santarsiere questioned Idaho’s ability to hunt one male bear with no females allowed, noting hunters could mistakenly kill a female.

Boudreau said most hunters would be inclined to hunt male bears. He said any inadvertent killing of a female would be subtracted from the following year’s hunt allotted to the three states. Boudreau said the killing of multiple female bears could possibly shut down hunting seasons.

“Whatever your feeling about grizzly bears,” Boudreau said, “this is one of the West’s greatest conservation stories. It’s a pretty small timeline that we’ve actively managed grizzly bears to a point where (hunting) is even a possibility.”

If hunting seasons occur in Idaho and Wyoming this fall, they would be the first since grizzlies received federal protections under the Endangered Species Act in 1975. Federal officials lifted those protections last year.


Teen injured in Vineland hunting shooting accident, police said


Vineland police

VINELAND — A teen was accidentally shot while hunting near the border of Vineland and Buena Vista Township Saturday with two friends, authorities said.

A group of teenagers were hunting waterfowl around 6 p.m. when an 18-year-old boy was struck in the arm with birdshot and taken to Cooper University Hospital in Camden with non-life-threatening injuries, police said.

New Jersey State Police told The Press of Atlantic City they first responded to the scene and then handed over the case to Vineland police.

The 18-year-old was struck with birdshot from a gun that was being used by one of his friends, who were both minors. Police are not releasing the names of the victim or his friends at this time.

Lt. Steve Triantos said the shooting appeared to be from an accidental discharge and Vineland Police are continuing to investigate, including sending the shotgun to a police lab.

Although the area contains some rural and wooded areas, Triantos said hunting accidents like this are not common.

Never miss breaking news as it happens! Sign up now to receive alerts delivered to your inbox.

Bald eagles suffering from lead poisoning

Tamarack Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center near Saegertown has admitted four eagles with high lead toxicity levels in recent weeks. Three have died.

SAEGERTOWN — Bald eagles in Pennsylvania are protected from hunters but not from the lead in hunting ammunition.

Tamarack Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center near Saegertown typically treats two or three eagles each year for lead poisoning. But in recent weeks, the center has admitted four adult bald eagles, two of which still had the metal in their stomachs. As of Thursday, only one of the birds was alive and was in “guarded” condition.

“We’re doing our best but it is difficult for birds to come back from lead toxicity levels this high,” said Carol Holmgren, Tamarack executive director and wildlife rehabilitator.

Since 2009, the nonprofit in Crawford County has admitted 71 bald eagles. Twenty-five tested positive for lead poisoning and four, not counting the bird now being treated, have survived, Holmgren said.

The most recent lead-poisoning patient to arrive was a 30-year-old bald eagle, assumed to be male, and nicknamed “Kiski” for the township in Armstrong County where it was found Sunday. The bird was taken to Tamarack on Monday.

Holmgren said the center has a special machine to test blood lead levels and this bird’s results were higher than the machine can read. She knows it’s a long shot to treat bald eagles with such high lead toxicity but Tamarack still tries.

“Morally, ethically, it’s worth it,” Holmgren said.

Treatment involves the administration of drugs, which can require a team of four people, including a main eagle handler, Holmgren said.

She said it’s “gut-wrenching” to see these beautiful birds “deathly ill in a very unpleasant way.” The lead harms their internal organs, she said.

Although no longer listed as endangered at the federal level, bald eagles are considered protected in Pennsylvania and can’t be hunted here.

In 1980, the commonwealth had a known nesting population of only three pairs of bald eagles, according to the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Fueled by a reintroduction program in the 1980s, the nesting eagles had increased to more than 270 pairs in 2013, according to the Game Commission.

Bands on Kiski show the bird’s age and that it was banded in Dauphin County. It’s believed the bird was brought to Pennsylvania from Saskatchewan as part of the reintroduction effort. The eagle has already survived being hit by a car, for which it was treated in 2012, Holmgren said.

The Game Commission cited the pesticide DDT and its effect on bald eagle reproduction as the primary reason the birds had declined. DDT use was banned in the United States in 1972.

While it’s good that the bald eagle population is rebounding, more birds also means more eagles suffering from lead poisoning, Holmgren said.

She doesn’t blame hunters, some of whom she said are wonderful conservationists.

“I think respectful education is what’s key,” Holmgren said about finding a solution to the lead problem.

She said the most obvious is to use non-lead ammunition. When that’s not possible, she said, it’s important to dispose of mammals killed with lead bullets or pellets in such a way that eagles and other predators and scavengers can’t find and eat remains that contain lead fragments.

Research indicates that the birds are ingesting the lead found in them, Holmgren said. Bald eagles are foragers that will scavenge mammal carcasses, according to the Game Commission. Holmgren said the birds could be eating the remains of deer, woodchucks and other mammals that have been killed with lead ammunition. The eagles could also be eating ducks that have swallowed lead sinkers or been killed with lead pellets.

“It’s lead they have digested that’s really hitting these birds hard,” Holmgren said.

Maine Season for Bobcat Hunting Starting as Deer Hunt Ends

Maine’s annual season for hunting wild cats is under way as the state transitions into its winter hunting seasons.

Dec. 2, 2017, at 8:18 a.m. 

Maine Season for Bobcat Hunting Starting as Deer Hunt Ends

AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Maine‘s annual season for hunting wild cats is under way as the state transitions into its winter hunting seasons.

The bobcat hunt began on Friday and runs until Feb. 21. The elusive cats live all over Maine, and a handful of hunting guides specialize in pursuing them.

There is no bag or possession limit for bobcats. Other winter hunting seasons include snowshoe hare, fox and coyote.

The season for hunting deer with muzzleloaders and archery is still under way in limited parts of the state. It runs until Dec. 9.

Mass Shootings and Domestic Violence and Violence toward Animals



*Violence begets more violence!*

We are largely an ethically/morally corrupt and socially backward society,
that is sleep-walking and in denial of what is right in front of our eyes! *WE
GLORIFY KILLING!* *WE JUSTIFY WAR* – and the destruction of millions of
innocent lives, in hypocritical defiance of the very religions we espouse
and say we practice! And our children are exposed to such violence from the
time they open their eyes.

Then there’s the *desensitizing *”past-time” of* SOCIALLY SANCTIONED
HUNTING*; more than *100 million animals/wildlife** are reported killed by
hunters each year; *that number does not include the millions of animals
for which kill figures are not maintained by state wildlife agencies; and,
more *than 2-3 million healthy/treatable/adoptable companion animals are
destroyed in “shelters” each year *simply because they have been abandoned
and are homeless.

*Harvesting, culling, killing, euthanizing – call it what you will – *

*we have said *

*· that it is OK to take the lives of non-human, cognitively aware
animals – to slaughter living, breathing, sentient beings, for our own
diversion, for narcissistic, self-aggrandising “sport”; to destroy “pests”
or eliminate “inconvenient” over-populations. *

*· that it is OK to exploit and take these lives for our own
amusement, convenience or to express grievances (animal cruelty still not
taken seriously in courts; animal welfare laws do not in most cases include
farm animals); *

*· that it is OK to kill and butcher billions of sentient creatures
for personal gain and profit, whether for the dinner plate, frivolous
apparel, fraudulent research, entertainment, or any other self-indulgent
reason we can think of. *

*Many studies have shown that there is a correlation between violence
toward animals, often beginning in childhood, and violence toward people,
but we still do little to deal with it. We’re too busy justifying and
glorifying it! What a sorry lot of unevolved “deplorables”, indeed!


“Until we have the courage to recognize cruelty for what it is, and do
something about it – whether the victim is human or animal – we cannot
expect things to be much better in this world…We cannot have peace among
men whose hearts delight in killing any living creature. By every act that
glorifies or even tolerates such moronic delight in killing we set back the
progress of humanity.”
*~Rachel Carson*

Peter’s Humor – Fall 2017

Article posted by C.A.S.H. Committee To Abolish Sport Hunting


From Peter Muller, Vice-President, C.A.S.H.

A hunter is introduced to his first thermos-bottle. He is very curious about it and asks the sales clerk what it does. The sales clerk says it’s a wonderful invention which keeps cold food cold and hot food hot. The hunter is very impressed and buys one.

On his next hunting-trip he tells his friends, “Just wait till you see what I got for lunch.” His friends’ curiosity is piqued and they press him to tell what it is that he brought with him. But he persists in not telling them.

Finally, it’s lunch time. With great ceremony, he pulls out his thermos bottle and proudly proclaims, “How would you like some hot soup and ice-cream?”


A guy is telling some hunting jokes to his friends. Finally one of them interrupts him saying, “Please be aware that I am and have been a hunter for years.”

The guy hesitates and says, “Sorry, should I start over and talk very, very slowly?”


A duck hunter bought a bird dog and discovered that the dog could actually walk on water. Shocked by his find, he was sure none of his friends would ever believe him, so he decided to take them all hunting with his new dog.

After a full day of not being able to kill any ducks, the host hunter decided to throw some floating balls into the pond to show his friends what would have happened had they killed any ducks. He urged them all to watch. Each time the hunter threw a ball, the dog calmly walked across the water and retrieved the balls while only getting his paws wet.

Finally, out of disappointment and boredom, the invited hunters decided to leave. The hunter who hosted their outing was surprised that no one had commented on his amazing new dog. Instead they sat stone-faced. This continued all the way back home.

Finally, the duck hunter couldn’t control himself any longer and asked his friends, “Did you notice anything unusual about my new dog?”

“I sure did,” responded the most pessimistic of the bunch. “He can’t swim.”

laughing animals

See more Articles


Hurricane, wildfire victims may apply for state hunting license refunds

Colorado Parks and Wildlife is issuing hunting license fee refunds and preference point restoration exceptions for hunters who had their Colorado hunts canceled due to hurricanes Harvey and Irma, as well as the many wildfires burning in the western states.

“We’re making an emergency exception to our policy of only providing refunds 30 days prior to the start of the hunting season,” Bob Broscheid, director of CPW, said in a news release. “We hope this provides some relief to the hurricane and fire victims, the first responders and family members with their homes flooded.”

Requests for refunds will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and no paybacks will be made for licenses that have been in the field. All requests must be submitted by Jan. 31, 2018, and those affected should call Sarah Lovik, the limited license refund coordinator, at 303-291-7208 to initiate that process.

When you call, please be prepared to provide proof that you have been impacted by the hurricanes or wildfires. Accepted documents include insurance claim numbers, FEMA number, a copy of a canceled hotel or flight reservation, or affidavit with signed narrative stating why you had to cancel your trip.

Arcade Hunting: No Tribute To The Great Outdoors

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke had a hunting video game installed in the agency’s cafeteria.

Molly Riley/AP

Secretary of Interior Ryan Zinke has just installed an arcade game called Big Buck Hunter Pro in his department’s cafeteria. Interior staffers can now take a few minutes’ break to aim toy rifles at a video screen and plink away at animated elk, antelope, caribou and deer.

The bucks fall over dead, but don’t bleed. It’s a game.

Secretary Zinke tweeted on Tuesday, “To highlight #sportsmen contributions 2 conservation I installed Big Buck Hunter in the employee cafeteria. Get excited for #hunting season!”

Secretary Zinke recently signed an order to expand hunting on public lands.

I do not hunt. That will not surprise almost anyone who listens to Weekend Edition. I do not find hunting a sport, as long as the deer and bears can’t shoot back.

But I know a few hunters, and have done hunting stories. I have even seen Big Buck Hunter games in a few bars. I respect that hunters cherish the outdoors and want to keep wilderness undeveloped and wild. I agree that people who eat cheeseburgers and holiday turkey shouldn’t look haughtily down their noses at hunting. The chicken breast you may grill tonight wasn’t born in that plastic wrap. Hunters at least lock eyes with what they eat.

Hunters don’t just aim, fire and fell deer like bowling pins.

I’m not as upset to see zombies, space invaders and super villains burst into flame when they’re zapped on screens, and maybe that’s all the animated deer are to anyone who fires away at them on Big Buck Hunter. But it’s Secretary Zinke who suggests this arcade game is some kind of tribute to hunters and conservation. You can also show respect for wildlife and wilderness by going into the woods and walking, looking and listening.

Man who shot 13 year old while squirrel hunting charged with involuntary manslaughter

OCEANA COUNTY, MICH. – A 62-year-old man has been charged with involuntary manslaughter after the death of 13-year-old Billy Gort, of Wyoming.

Roger Hoeker shot Gort in the head while on a squirrel hunting trip back on Feb. 18, 2017.

The two, along with another teen, were all on a hunting trip as part of a youth outreach program called Christianity Outdoors. Hoeker was also a Michigan hunter safety instructor.

Gort and his friend were both wearing orange hunter safety gear at the time that he was shot.

The Michigan State Police in conjunction with investigators from multiple other departments have now concluded their investigation, and Hoeker was arrested on Monday for involuntary manslaughter.

Hoeker was arraigned in court earlier this morning, and will appear for his preliminary hearings later this month.

The Trouble With The First Nation’s Deer Hunt In Niagara’s Short Hills Provincial Park

A Commentary by Barry Kent MacKay, Senior Program Associate in the Canadian
office of Born Free U.S.A.

Posted November 29th, 2016 on Niagara At Large

Niagara, Ontario – Regarding the deer hunt or cull in Short Hills Provincial
Park in Niagara, I wonder if the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and
Forestry (MNRF) is using the Haudenosaunee to promote “hunting as a wildlife
management tool” because their revenues are in decline from hunter (and
fisher) licenses issued.

Of course such revenue does not come from First Nations, whose treaty rights
override rules applied to everyone else. Thus my theory, in part, is that
it is seen as in the fiscal interest of the MNRF to support the conception
of hunting being necessary, overall.

I have had MNRF officials claim it is necessary to reduce deer numbers and
also claim that it is not – that the hunt is just a hunt.

I think the hunters are using the MNRF to provide the opportunity to have a
private hunting preserve with tame deer available for exercising
treaty-granted “rights” that are all too often stomped on in so many other
areas, including those fundamental to preservation of contributors to
cultural identity, including language and religion.

Indicators of overpopulation, such as starving deer, reduced fawn production
and heavy browse lines, are all missing here. The hunt is assuredly more
disruptive of the Short Hills Park’s ecosystem, than any naturally occurring
species within that ecosystem, including deer.

Vastly more deer are killed by non-First Nation hunters and poachers outside
the park than the relatively small number so easily killed within it.
However, I have some conservation concern as viable woodland in the region
is long gone and I do worry that the survival of some woodland-wetland
species (amphibians and invertebrates particularly) could be compromised by
the degradation of the park that follows the hunting activities.

I’m thinking, here, of such things as the run-off from deep ruts, which are
also breeding grounds for mosquitoes disruptive to the ecosystem dynamics
one would hope a park would preserve.

I believe that there is no such thing as an “inherent” right, so that
invariably the “right” of one person must come at the cost of at least a
part of the right of another (often to a trivial degree, such as my
neighbour’s right to mow his lawn coming at my right to a peaceful and quiet
Saturday morning). Whether “rights” are inherent or not, the only rights
that matter, pragmatically, are those enshrined in legislation that is

First Nations are not alone in wanting to kill animals. Nearly all
societies, cultures, demographics, religions, cults and other identifiable
segments of humanity have reasons to kill, often under the guise of

From kosher and halal slaughter through economic submission to economies to
scale in assembly-line slaughter to bull-fighting in Spain, dog-eating in
Asia, fox hunting in the UK, the Nepalese Gadhimai festival slaughter of
thousands of animals, Latin American cock fighting or east-coast seal
clubbing or Japanese dolphin slaughter to assurances by St. Thomas of
Aquinas that it’s just fine for Christians to make use of animals, “either
by killing them or in any other way whatever” so long as it does not
“dehumanize” the killer.

We love to kill.

One could list countless such examples of culturally sanctioned killing,
with a small but increasing minority questioning it all as we enter an era
of human-caused mass extinctions, but it is the animals who, not able to
vote or voice their defense, are most often victimized by people with what
is to them, solid rationales.

I’ve talked to many people in opposition to the hunt, including a
card-carrying First Nations (but not Haudenosaunee, and obviously feeling in
a position of conflict and a Metis, as well as colleagues who have stood
with the First Nations on various other issues.

It’s a Pandora’s Box that ought never to have been opened and has divided
the community, reduced property values, and led to rancor and disruption and
community polarization, and not just a little fearfulness.

It also bothers me that everyone else can and does find hunting
opportunities throughout the region, while the Haudenosaunee argue that they
are constantly discriminated against, and not allowed access to hunt on
private land that is open to non-First Nations sport hunters. t is an
allegation which, if true, is disquieting, to say the least, as a
manifestation of bigotry.

On the other hand, I’m reluctant to throw that term around casually since
people who stand with First Nations on other issues have been accused, at
least in dog-whistle language, of racism whereas, in fact, it hardly matters
to them what demographic one belongs to; the concerns raised by the local
people protesting the hunt seem quite valid and only directed at the
activity, not who does it.

I’d be infuriated if the deer and other animals I had come to know
individually through the year in areas near me, even visiting my yard, were
then allowed to be slaughtered. I have my own spiritual needs, and that
includes respect for lives of others, even other species!

There is this assumption at work with this hunt that the MNRF and/or
Haudenosaunee know more about deer than anyone. I am not young (indeed,
were I First Nation I’d be an “elder”) and I have had a life-time of
interaction with government wildlife managers and it has been my experience
that while they often have access to very solid research from wildlife
biologists and scientist, both on the government payroll and from academia,
the managers’ decisions often ignore best advice and are driven by various
political expediencies .

The places animals can live safe from humanity’s need to kill are few, and
should be protected.

About Born Free U.S.A. – Born Free USA is a national animal advocacy
nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization. . Our mission is to end the suffering of
wild animals in captivity, rescue individual animals in need, protect
wildlife – including highly endangered species – in their natural habitats,
and encourage compassionate conservation globally.

For more information on Born Free U.S.A., click on – .