Trump has a dangerous disability

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-has-a-dangerous-disability/2017/05/03/56ca6118-2f6b-11e7-9534-00e4656c22aa_story.html?tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.e5adfeca6876

Trump’s puzzling way of handling interviews

Opinion writer May 3 at 7:36 PM

It is urgent for Americans to think and speak clearly about President Trump’s inability to do either. This seems to be not a mere disinclination but a disability. It is not merely the result of intellectual sloth but of an untrained mind bereft of information and married to stratospheric self-confidence.

In February, acknowledging Black History Month, Trump said that “Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice.” Because Trump is syntactically challenged, it was possible and tempting to see this not as a historical howler about a man who died 122 years ago, but as just another of Trump’s verbal fender benders, this one involving verb tenses.

Now, however, he has instructed us that Andrew Jackson was angry about the Civil War that began 16 years after Jackson’s death. Having, let us fancifully imagine, considered and found unconvincing William Seward’s 1858 judgment that the approaching Civil War was “an irrepressible conflict,” Trump says:

Library shelves groan beneath the weight of books asking questions about that war’s origins, so who, one wonders, are these “people” who don’t ask the questions that Trump evidently thinks have occurred to him uniquely? Presumably they are not the astute “lot of,” or at least “some,” people Trump referred to when speaking about his February address to a joint session of Congress: “A lot of people have said that, some people said it was the single best speech ever made in that chamber.” Which demotes Winston Churchill, among many others.

What is most alarming (and mortifying to the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated) is not that Trump has entered his eighth decade unscathed by even elementary knowledge about the nation’s history. As this column has said before, the problem isn’t that he does not know this or that, or that he does not know that he does not know this or that. Rather, the dangerous thing is that he does not know what it is to know something.

The United States is rightly worried that a strange and callow leader controls North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. North Korea should reciprocate this worry. Yes, a 70-year-old can be callow if he speaks as sophomorically as Trump did when explaining his solution to Middle Eastern terrorism: “I would bomb the s— out of them. . . . I’d blow up the pipes, I’d blow up the refineries, I’d blow up every single inch, there would be nothing left.”

As a candidate, Trump did not know what the nuclear triad is. Asked about it, he said: “We have to be extremely vigilant and extremely careful when it comes to nuclear. Nuclear changes the whole ballgame.” Invited to elaborate, he said: “I think — I think, for me, nuclear is just the power, the devastation is very important to me.” Someone Trump deemed fit to be a spokesman for him appeared on television to put a tasty dressing on her employer’s word salad: “What good does it do to have a good nuclear triad if you’re afraid to use it?” To which a retired Army colonel appearing on the same program replied with amazed asperity: “The point of the nuclear triad is to be afraid to use the damn thing.”

As president-elect, Trump did not know the pedigree and importance of the one-China policy. About such things he can be, if he is willing to be, tutored. It is, however, too late to rectify this defect: He lacks what T.S. Eliot called a sense “not only of the pastness of the past, but of its presence.” His fathomless lack of interest in America’s path to the present and his limitless gullibility leave him susceptible to being blown about by gusts of factoids that cling like lint to a disorderly mind.

Americans have placed vast military power at the discretion of this mind, a presidential discretion that is largely immune to restraint by the Madisonian system of institutional checks and balances. So, it is up to the public to quarantine this presidency by insistently communicating to its elected representatives a steady, rational fear of this man whose combination of impulsivity and credulity render him uniquely unfit to take the nation into a military conflict.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Trump has a dangerous disability

  1. Trump doesn’t have the background or temperament to be president. And with all her background and experience, Hillary couldn’t read the mood of a huge section of the country whose way of life had been deteriorating for decades and who weren’t going to take it anymore. The Democrats still don’t quite get it.

    These are the people were supposed to trust to be in charge.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I really don’t think Hillary had a problem in reading anyone’s mood. She was always a champion of women, children and the down trodden. Hillary had a policy for whatever ails humans from A – Z, and she worked tirelessly throughout her life before and after law school. Unfortunately, Director Comey’s letter along with the noise about newly hacked e-mails droning relentlessly on a daily basis and the GOP’s shameless chants of “lock her up”, moved the masses with disgust. Hillary’s campaign froze the last days until Comey said – never mind there is nothing there. The churches called her a “political criminal” even though she was never charged by the Atty Genl or her deputy. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more repulsive campaign which was a barn yard brawl most of the time. Trump is carrying it forward as we type. He belongs with the WWE group and audience.

      Like

  2. I rarely agree with George Will, but he is spot- on about trump. There is a deep disconnect between the ” leaders” of the democrat party and the average working or even middle class voter. I consider myself to be pretty progressive on most issues, but the flood of illegal immigrants into our country is a problem that must be addressed , and soon. I think it is a situation that is the primary cause of ” brexit”, and the disatisfaction with a lot of people in the United States as well. After reading books like How Many is Too Many by Phillip Cafaro ( a self- identified progressive) and Life On the Brink, edited by Eileen Crist, I am reinforced in the fact that the fact of human overpopulation/ immigration is on the radar screen of people who care about others, but realize that without limits and boundaries, we are dooming ourselves and other species.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: